Rank your projects against agreed criteria

Set your criteria and weights, score each project from 1 to 5, and see the weighted ranking with the maths shown. It runs in your browser.

Private by design

Decide and agree criteria

Step 1 of 4

Choose three to five things that should decide which project goes first, and agree them with the people who will approve the work. Describe each one so that 5 is the best score.

Start from an example:

Loading an example replaces everything below.

Medium

Some

Add up to 8 criteria. Three to five usually keeps the discussion focused.

Weights are relative: a criterion weighted 4 counts twice as much as one weighted 2.

Score your work

Step 2 of 4

Score each project from 1 to 5: 1 is poor, 5 is the best, as you described it in step 1. Leave a score blank if you’re not sure yet, and click a chosen score again to clear it.

Name this scorecard (optional)

3 projects · 6 criteria · 0 of 18 scores entered

Project	Strategic fitcounts 3×	Valuecounts 3×	Costcounts 2×	Riskcounts 2×	Urgencycounts 2×	People neededcounts 2×	Delete
0 of 6 scored
0 of 6 scored
0 of 6 scored

0 of 18 scores entered. Blanks are fine for now.

See the ranking

Step 3 of 4

Updates as you score, based on 0 of 18 scores.

Score at least one project on every criterion to see the ranking.

This ranking is a starting point for discussion. It doesn’t decide what to fund: people do, using the evidence behind each score.

Next, take it to the meeting, or ask your AI tool to challenge the scores.

Share and agree

Step 4 of 4

Take the ranking into your meeting, or ask your organisation’s approved AI tool to stress-test it. Nothing is saved on our side.

Challenge my scores

We’ll prepare a request for your organisation’s approved AI tool. It asks the AI to:

show which criteria most influence the ranking
spot scores that look inconsistent
suggest the evidence a sponsor may ask for
point out trade-offs, without saying what to fund

Available once at least one project is fully scored.